Subject: Re: [boost] [test] boost.test owner unresponsive topersistent problems for multiple years
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-07 13:37:08
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > a situation where a lone worker was solely controlling a key library
> > used by almost all others.
> Isn't that exactly how boost is designed to work?
No. A design is not synonymous with its failure modes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk