Subject: Re: [boost] [test] boost.test owner unresponsive to persistent problems for multiple years
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-07 13:30:09
Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> a situation where a lone worker was solely controlling a key library
> used by almost all others.
Isn't that exactly how boost is designed to work?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk