Subject: Re: [boost] Futures
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-08 00:43:12
Am 08.01.2015 03:21 schrieb "Vicente J. Botet Escriba" <
> Le 08/01/15 02:36, Hartmut Kaiser a Ã©crit :
>> Whatever you do, I'd suggest not to tie the API to any of the
>> synchronization objects.
> Is a condition_variable a kernel synchronization object in HPX?
No it's not.
Just a side note: we even try to avoid asio as much as possible due to it's
kernel based synchronization (a context switch into the kernel is just too
much for a low latency, high bandwidth network).
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk