Subject: Re: [boost] Road to low-quality-code is paved with good intentions of dropping dependencies
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-09 11:30:55
Daniel James wrote:
> I would like to use 'libs/functional/hash/include' but our tools don't
> support it. There was an attempt to reorganise mpl along those lines, but
> it was abandoned. If it had been successful I would have done the same.
Our tools actually do support it. The problem with mpl was caused by
#includes via a macro, which were accidentally working under the old
organization and broke under the new one. That said,
> > It should just be in libs/hash.
is still the right thing to do.
> But it isn't. I'm not going to waste time moving things around now.
<shrug> Suit yourself.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk