Subject: Re: [boost] Futures (was: Re: [compute] Some remarks)
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-12 20:24:32
On January 12, 2015 5:32:23 PM EST, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 12 Jan 2015 at 16:19, Sylvester-Bradley, Gareth wrote:
> > On 12 January 2015 15:30, Niall Douglas wrote:
> > > On 7 Jan 2015 at 12:40, Thomas Heller wrote:
> > > > Just a minor very unrelated remark. I find the name "BindLib"
> very confusing.
> > >
> > > The library is a toolkit for locally binding libraries into
> > > namespaces :).
> > I've not come across the word 'Bind' used this way in C++, and of
> course it is used for other things.
> > Would 'Alias' or 'NamespaceAlias' work?
> Those unfortunately have even more confusing alternative meanings in
> I do agree about BindLib being a poor name. It is actually onto its
> third choice of name now :( but to date, it's the least terrible of
> the reasonably descriptive library names I have thought of.
> Any better names gratefully received.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk