Subject: Re: [boost] Futures (was: Re: [compute] Some remarks)
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-13 08:38:48
On 12 Jan 2015 at 20:24, Rob Stewart wrote:
> > I do agree about BindLib being a poor name. It is actually onto its
> > third choice of name now :( but to date, it's the least terrible of
> > the reasonably descriptive library names I have thought of.
> > Any better names gratefully received.
NameMappingLib or just plain NameMapping?
How about APIMapping? BindLib also provides API version management
via preprocessor metaprogramming.
Would even APIBind be better?
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk