Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Futures (was: Re: [compute] Some remarks)
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-13 08:38:48

On 12 Jan 2015 at 20:24, Rob Stewart wrote:

> > I do agree about BindLib being a poor name. It is actually onto its
> > third choice of name now :( but to date, it's the least terrible of
> > the reasonably descriptive library names I have thought of.
> >
> > Any better names gratefully received.
> Name[space]Mapping

NameMappingLib or just plain NameMapping?

How about APIMapping? BindLib also provides API version management
via preprocessor metaprogramming.

Would even APIBind be better?


ned Productions Limited Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at