Subject: Re: [boost] transforming ex. boost lib into C++11-only lib?
From: Thijs van den Berg (thijs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-22 09:36:34
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]>
> is it permitted to transform an existing boost library into a C++11-only
Interesting question. I think there are two types:
* a library that's completely standalone -no dependencies to anything
boost- and requires C++11
* a library that's coupled to libs in boost, but one that doesn't compile
with a pre C++11 compiler.
The benefit of an aditional C++11 version of an existing lib would IMO be
decoupeling from dependency of other libs -like the first type-. The second
type is a rewrite where some dependencies to boost are replaces with C++11
dependencies for various reasons: perhaps less lines,or better
performance,or better maintainability..
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk