Subject: Re: [boost] transforming ex. boost lib into C++11-only lib?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-22 09:47:20
2015-01-22 15:36 GMT+01:00 Thijs van den Berg <thijs_at_[hidden]>:
> The benefit of an aditional C++11 version of an existing lib would IMO be
> decoupeling from dependency of other libs -like the first type-. The second
> type is a rewrite where some dependencies to boost are replaces with C++11
> dependencies for various reasons: perhaps less lines,or better
> performance,or better maintainability..
In the case of boost.coroutine both applies (decoupling from dependency of
and better maintainability because of using C++11 features like lambdas
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk