Subject: Re: [boost] [config] defining __has_extension in suffix.hpp?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-22 10:46:26
Rob Stewart wrote:
> On January 22, 2015 3:56:12 AM EST, John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]>
> > However, aren't those reserved symbols? If we're being pedantic....
> I was going to point out the same. What about BOOST_HAS_FEATURE and
Works for me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk