Subject: Re: [boost] transforming ex. boost lib into C++11-only lib?
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-24 12:38:37
Roland Bock wrote:
> On 2015-01-24 17:13, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Pete bartlett wrote:
>>>> OK - thx for your suggestions.
>>>> Who do I have to ask for an additional coroutine2 ?
>>> Coroutine11, perhaps?
>> In fact, make TWO new libraries: Coroutine11 and Coroutine14!
> IF Coroutine benefits from C++14 over C++11, I would skip the C++11
> version and go for the C++14 version directly.
FYI: I was kidding.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk