Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Endian mini-review
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-25 10:24:56
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Philip Bennefall <philip_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> This is my first time reviewing a Boost library, so I figured a mini-review
> might be a good place to start.
> I did not look at the library during the formal review, so I am approaching
> it as a new user. I have read through the documentation and parts of the
> reference, and I think it looks good. The documentation does a good job of
> explaining the pros and cons of the three usage patterns, and I am happy
> with the performance measurements. I also looked through the source, and was
> pleasantly surprised to see the modest dependency list. That's a
> deal-breaker for me when deciding which Boost libraries to use.
> One thing I was not quite clear on is, what features are disabled in C++03
> mode? Can this be clarified a little?
New section, added. See
> I was happy to find the support for unaligned types with byte sizes other
> than 1, 2, 4 and 8. This, in combination with dynamic_bitset, would have
> been very useful when I implemented a MIDI file parser a little while ago.
> In my view, an endianness library should have been in Boost 10 years ago. I
> vote for acceptance.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk