Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-02 13:40:38
Robert Ramey wrote:
> I think that there's a lot more too it than "splitting serialization".
The starting point is establishing that there are circular dependencies and
they are a problem. If we agree to that, then we can talk about resolving
You don't agree that there is a problem.
> The main problem is the concept of "dependency" as revealed in our charts
> misleading. When we say one module is dependent upon another what to we
Let's start with 'The headers include headers of another module.'
> I don't know how our dependency
> tool define dependency.
The headers include headers of another module.
You do know that. It has been explained before.
Do you know anything about C++17/clang modules? Have you heard of the
concept at least?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk