Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-03 15:30:12
Robert Ramey wrote:
> And my proposal for the "bridge" module (maybe better called "forward"
> module is just that - a proposal. I would like time to think about that
> some more - a hear what other's have to say as well.
* Educate yourself about C++17/Clang modules
* If modular releases are a goal, as you claim, decide which tarballs should
be created for releases. One repo one tarball or something different?
* Determine how C++17/Clang modules relate to modular boost releases.
* Determine whether forwarding headers fit into the very real scenario of a
world where C++17/Clang modules are pervasive.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk