Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-04 11:23:12
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Nevin Liber
> Sent: 04 February 2015 16:08
> To: Renee Silverman
> Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
> > what about when boost hits 500 libraries?
> Boost added what, *two* libraries last year? At that rate, the 500 library problem won't happen
> *23rd century*.
> Lots of other stuff has to scale first: the number of submissions, the number of reviews, the
> maintainers, etc.
> And yes, even at 500, I still want them all, if it minimizes my dependency management problem. I
> want to take a newer/older version of a specific library, but that's about it.
I've kept out of these not-too-measured discussions so far, but I am feeling the same way as Nevin.
The whole build and module system of C/C++ is now very outdated.
Work on C++ modules is proceeding, if slowly.
The effect of C++Modules is likely to be very big (and the benefits big too).
All our work reducing dependency could be in vain, or even make things worse.
I am strongly opposed to making any more than trivial changes for some so-far illusory benefits.
Please - let's wait until C++ modules are looking a bit more promising before we do anything more.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk