Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-17 03:38:44
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Niall Douglas
> On 17 Feb 2015 at 0:56, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
>> [Niall Douglas]
>> > what's the point of keeping static libs?
>> Redist unnecessary, single executable, immunity to DLL replacement
>> mischief (consider antivirus products).
> Have the problems with mixing binaries compiled against the DLL with
> others compiled against the static lib been fixed in the new
AFAIK DLLs should always use the DLL CRT.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk