Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows

Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-17 03:38:44

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:44 AM, Niall Douglas
<s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 17 Feb 2015 at 0:56, Stephan T. Lavavej wrote:
>
>> [Niall Douglas]
>> > what's the point of keeping static libs?
>>
>> Redist unnecessary, single executable, immunity to DLL replacement
>> mischief (consider antivirus products).
>
> Have the problems with mixing binaries compiled against the DLL with
> others compiled against the static lib been fixed in the new
> refactor?

AFAIK DLLs should always use the DLL CRT.

-- 
Olaf