Subject: Re: [boost] [mpl] multiset
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-24 19:17:32
On 24 Feb 2015 at 20:06, Bruno Dutra wrote:
> Do you see anything so broken within MPL's design that justifies dropping
> backwards compatibility and redesign a new library from scratch? Is it
> really necessary, considering the existence of other modern options which
> already focus on an strict C++14 approach, such as Hana?
I'm curious: could Hana be wrapped with a MPL compatible shim API? As
in, would that be a sane or insane idea?
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk