Subject: Re: [boost] [TypeSort] Automatic type sorting
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-21 22:47:27
Louis Dionne wrote:
> Eric Niebler <eniebler <at> boost.org> writes:
> > FWIW, these indices don't seem all that useful to me. What exactly was
> > the desired behavior?
> No idea :-)
The desired behavior was for indexing the sorted tuple to work like indexing
the original tuple. That is, given tuple<char, char, char, char,
char>, you were supposed to produce another tuple for which get<0> still
returns char, even though the first element is physically char.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk