Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [TypeSort] Automatic type sorting
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-21 22:47:27

Louis Dionne wrote:
> Eric Niebler <eniebler <at>> writes:
> > FWIW, these indices don't seem all that useful to me. What exactly was
> > the desired behavior?
> No idea :-)

The desired behavior was for indexing the sorted tuple to work like indexing
the original tuple. That is, given tuple<char[4], char[2], char[1], char[5],
char[3]>, you were supposed to produce another tuple for which get<0> still
returns char[4], even though the first element is physically char[1].

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at