Subject: Re: [boost] [rational] has no maintainers
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-23 15:23:09
> That applies to rational as well? Thanks for the response.
No, rational still has no maintainer, some of the PR's (um... mine
actually) may need some careful thought before applying as they're
breaking changes... but are arguably the right thing to do...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk