Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem

Subject: Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem
From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-04 18:08:36

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> You need to use a recursive union if you are to get some constexpr support.
>

Well, let me rephrase, you can expand it out by preprocessor to a certain
limit and get that too, but you can't just use aligned storage. At some
point you need to hit a recursive case.

-- 
-Matt Calabrese