Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem

Subject: Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-04 19:18:20

AMDG

On 04/04/2015 05:07 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
> 
> Matt said aligned storage can't be used; hence, I assume
> he meant that the required alignment for the aligned storage
> would require recursion, but that would be constexpr
> template *function* recursion not template struct or
> union recursion.

This doesn't make any sense to me.  The reason
that aligned storage doesn't work has nothing
to do with calculating the alignment.

>  Hence, I suppose Matt meant the recursion
> requirement was for functions not commposites (e.g. struct or union).
> 

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe