Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem

Subject: Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-04 19:20:51

On 04/04/2015 06:18 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> AMDG
> 
> On 04/04/2015 05:07 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
>>
>> Matt said aligned storage can't be used; hence, I assume
>> he meant that the required alignment for the aligned storage
>> would require recursion, but that would be constexpr
>> template *function* recursion not template struct or
>> union recursion.
> 
> This doesn't make any sense to me.  The reason
> that aligned storage doesn't work has nothing
> to do with calculating the alignment.

Why does using aligned_storage not work, please?

> 
>>  Hence, I suppose Matt meant the recursion
>> requirement was for functions not commposites (e.g. struct or union).
>>
> 
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>