Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-05 03:07:43

Next message: pfultz2: "Re: [boost] [Developing for Boost saves time]( was Re: Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem)"
Previous message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem"
In reply to: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection"
Next in thread: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection"

On 04/05/2015 01:33 AM, Steven Watanabe wrote:

> "Works" means that the libraries are built for
> the correct architecture, although there's no
> easy way to verify this automatically. The
> best way I can think of is to write a trivial
> program to link against the newly generated
> libraries. file might also work.

With gcc, I just use "-n" to observe command-lines, which contain either -m32 or -m64.

-- 
Vladimir Prus
CodeSourcery / Mentor Embedded
http://vladimirprus.com

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk