Subject: Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-05 14:09:24
On 04/05/2015 11:41 AM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> Steven Watanabe-4 wrote
>> If architecture and address-model are not
>> specified, they should not appear in any
>> build paths.
> This is very confusing. This means that I often have multiple sets of
> results which are actually exactly the same. so if I specify
> b2 ...
> b2 addressmodel=64,32
> I end up with three sets of results - two of which are identical. Now I
> can't tell which the "blank" one is supposed to match. Please think about
No, you end up with two sets of results.
Steven Watanabe wrote:
> If either architecture or address-model is
> unspecified, then the behavior will be the
> same as if it were set to the compiler default.
This includes the build directories.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk