Subject: Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-05 16:24:42
On 04/05/2015 01:11 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> Steven Watanabe-4 wrote
>> No, you end up with two sets of results.
> Hmmmm - That's not what I'm seeing.
If so, it's a bug.
> I'm seeing a directory with a set of
> results. Within that directory I'm seeing a subdirectory named
> address-model-64 and another one with name address-model-32. Each of these
> latter two have their own set of results. One of these is the same as those
> in the parent directory.
> In fairness, I'm speaking from memory as I'm now building/testing all
> combinations. I'll double check this again when I'm done.
Did you clean the old directories? The code
used to generate both address-model-32 and
address-model-64. The whole point of Vladimir's
changes was to suppress this directory when it
matches the default compiler settings.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk