Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-07 04:33:58

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> So my vote is for building 64-bit binaries on a 64-bit system by
> default. This is also consistent with other systems.
>

Even with that, having no way for tools (like CMake) to identify one
version from the other
is problematic when you actually need to support both.
Both building the OS native binaries and having a convention to identify
both 32 and 64bit versions would help.