Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost, config, context, log, 1.58] address-model and architecture detection
From: mloskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-23 15:02:09

Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Andrey Semashev <

> andrey.semashev@

> >
> wrote:
>> So my vote is for building 64-bit binaries on a 64-bit system by
>> default. This is also consistent with other systems.
> Even with that, having no way for tools (like CMake) to identify one
> version from the other is problematic when you actually need to support
> both.
> Both building the OS native binaries and having a convention to identify
> both 32 and 64bit versions would help.

I second that too.
As a user of CMake+Boost tandem, I find the issue a PITA indeed.


Mateusz Loskot,
Charter Member of OSGeo,
Member of ACCU,
View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at