Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem
From: pfultz2 (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-09 14:45:03

Next message: Abhinav Tripathi: "[boost] [Boost Document Library] Which SDK / OS to use for development?"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Fwd: Boost.Python build error in 1.58 RC1, 2 and 3 (OK in Beta 1)"
In reply to: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem"
Next in thread: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem"
Reply: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] Another variant type (was: [peer review queue tardiness] [was Cleaning out the Boost review queue] Review Queue mem"

> For instance, copying/moving the variant (at least in the general case)
> cannot be accomplished in the language with constexpr currently

Why can't you create a constexpr copy constructor with a recursive union?

Paul

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Another-variant-type-was-peer-review-queue-tardiness-was-Cleaning-out-the-Boost-review-queue-Review--tp4674046p4674360.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk