Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] default constructor for period?
From: Chris Glover (c.d.glover_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-30 14:31:39
> But std::deque depends on (as does some of my other code) it's type having
> a default constructor. I'm surprised it does not already exists.
In what situation are you finding the std::deque requires an object to be
default constructible? As far as I know this is simply not true for any
std containers so I'd like to know how you've happened upon this.