Subject: Re: [boost] [date_time] default constructor for period?
From: Chris Glover (c.d.glover_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-04-30 14:31:39
> But std::deque depends on (as does some of my other code) it's type having
> a default constructor. I'm surprised it does not already exists.
In what situation are you finding the std::deque requires an object to be
default constructible? As far as I know this is simply not true for any
std containers so I'd like to know how you've happened upon this.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk