Subject: Re: [boost] [move] unique_ptr converting constructor
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-06 08:07:53
Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> El 06/05/2015 a las 0:13, Peter Dimov escribió:
> > This aside, ought not unique_ptr and make_unique be in boost instead of
> > movelib? I'll remove boost::make_unique if we do this.
> No problems on my side, we just need to discuss if
> boost::movelib::unique_ptr's quality is enough to become the "official"
> unique_ptr implementation in Boost.
It's not like it has any competition. :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk