Re: [boost] [lambda] Addressing pull requests

Subject: Re: [boost] [lambda] Addressing pull requests
From: Gary Powell (gwpowell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-06 19:29:53

AFAIK, Phoenix doesn't have 100% replacement so it should happen in the
future, but maybe not right this minute.  If any changes to the Lambda
library should be made, it would be to remove the result  type deduction in
favor of calls to decltype. That would cut about 50% of the code out.

  Yours,
  -Gary-

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am willing to handle lambda maintenance. I do not anticipate any major
> > changes, only possible bug fixes, since Boost.Phoenix is a worthy
> successor
> > to Boost.Lambda functionality. I will ask for admin rights to make any
> > lambda changes that are necessary.
>
>
> Are there any plans to eventually deprecate/remove Boost.Lambda entirely in
> favor of Phoenix?
>
> --
> -Matt Calabrese
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>

-- 
------------------
gwpowell_at_[hidden]