Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-13 14:14:33
On 5/13/2015 1:51 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 13 May 2015 at 13:00, Edward Diener wrote:
>> It is definitely worth discussing. The key is "with well documented (and
>> encoded) dependencies among them".
>> How do we do this ? '
> APIBind provides a formal dependencies implementation system at the
> C++ namespace level.
Where is APIBind ? Is it documented and tested ? Have you formally
submitted it to Boost in any way ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk