Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-13 14:42:31
On 13 May 2015 at 13:29, Nevin Liber wrote:
> > I don't know what this means. No one can be serious that Boost libraries
> > must be designed with no dependencies on other Boost libraries.
> *No one* wants to manage dependencies. I treat monolithic Boost as one
> dependency in my projects for that very reason.
I don't anybody at any stage has proposed this. This is a pure
strawman by Edward.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk