Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-13 15:20:01

On 5/13/2015 2:42 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 13 May 2015 at 13:29, Nevin Liber wrote:
>
>>> I don't know what this means. No one can be serious that Boost libraries
>>> must be designed with no dependencies on other Boost libraries.
>>>
>>
>> +1.
>>
>> *No one* wants to manage dependencies.  I treat monolithic Boost as one
>> dependency in my projects for that very reason.
>
> I don't anybody at any stage has proposed this. This is a pure
> strawman by Edward.

What is a "pure strawman" mentioned by me ?