Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 19:11:38

On 14 May 2015 at 18:52, Edward Diener wrote:

> > This isn't the claim. The claim is that so long as the libraries in
> > Boost which depend on STL11 equivalents cannot use the STL11
> > equivalent, they are suffering from at least these problems:
> What do you mean by "STL11 equivalents" ?

I just covered this in my talk today.

A full list of exactly which APIs are exactly equivalent can be found


ned Productions Limited Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at