Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 19:11:38
On 14 May 2015 at 18:52, Edward Diener wrote:
> > This isn't the claim. The claim is that so long as the libraries in
> > Boost which depend on STL11 equivalents cannot use the STL11
> > equivalent, they are suffering from at least these problems:
> What do you mean by "STL11 equivalents" ?
I just covered this in my talk today.
A full list of exactly which APIs are exactly equivalent can be found
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk