Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 19:34:32
On 5/14/2015 7:11 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 14 May 2015 at 18:52, Edward Diener wrote:
>>> This isn't the claim. The claim is that so long as the libraries in
>>> Boost which depend on STL11 equivalents cannot use the STL11
>>> equivalent, they are suffering from at least these problems:
>> What do you mean by "STL11 equivalents" ?
> I just covered this in my talk today.
That doesn't help me.
I'll try again, even not knowing what you mean by "STL11 equivalents".
Why would libraries in Boost which depend on STL11 equivalents not be
able to use the STL11 equivalent ?
> A full list of exactly which APIs are exactly equivalent can be found
> at https://github.com/ned14/Boost.APIBind/tree/master/bind.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk