Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 19:27:42
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I was not being sarcastic.
> I haven't seen people on this list face the issue of which libraries have
> maintainers and which do not, although it has been raised repeatedly.
As Niall wrote elsewhere in this thread, addressing the collection of that
information is apparently in progress.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk