Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries

Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 19:27:42

Stephen Kelly wrote:

> I was not being sarcastic.
> 
> I haven't seen people on this list face the issue of which libraries have
> maintainers and which do not, although it has been raised repeatedly.
 
As Niall wrote elsewhere in this thread, addressing the collection of that 
information is apparently in progress.

Thanks,

Steve.