Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boostlibraries
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-15 11:03:39
On May 14, 2015 9:01:15 PM MDT, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I also wonder to what degree does anyone care that they have a mixture
> e.g. std::function and boost::function in their code base.
Having duplicate functionally means larger binaries and more cache misses. Therefore, having both is undesirable.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk