Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boostlibraries

Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boostlibraries
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-15 11:03:39

On May 14, 2015 9:01:15 PM MDT, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I also wonder to what degree does anyone care that they have a mixture
> of
> e.g. std::function and boost::function in their code base. 

Having duplicate functionally means larger binaries and more cache misses. Therefore, having both is undesirable.

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)