Subject: Re: [boost] Deprecation Policy
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-16 18:52:25
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> I imagine it's entirety possible to produce a "boost release" (or "distro"
> to use a term Niall suggested) consisting of all the latest releases of
> individual boost libraries.
> You might argue that it's hard to guarantee compatibility among them. But
> that has been a problem Boost has been plagued with forever: no two boost
> releases have ever given any guaranty of compatibility. So here again, a
> little change in policy would very much benefit boost users.
I'm not sure I understand.
One of the points of doing a Boost release is that the versions of the
libraries included in it are compatible with each other. If library X is
updated in a way that breaks libraries Y, Z and W, this breakage is
(generally) either fixed before the release or X is rolled back.
How would losing this very much benefit users is something that's not
immediately obvious to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk