Subject: [boost] [type_traits] difference in decay semantic between boost and standard library
From: Anton Bikineev (ant.bikineev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-17 04:01:06
Is it expected semantic of boost::decay not to strip top-level constness?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk