Subject: Re: [boost] Environment Variables Library?
From: Gavin Lambert (gavinl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-18 19:27:15
On 19/05/2015 09:23, Michael Ainsworth wrote:
> Such a library would be reasonable small, but do you think it would
> be a useful addition to Boost? I'm still shaking my head that
> environment variables aren't better supported by standard C++.
They're more popular in POSIX; but at least on Windows, environment
variables are considered old-fashioned and discouraged from use without
significant compelling reason.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk