Re: [boost] [next gen future-promise] What to call the monadic return type?

Subject: Re: [boost] [next gen future-promise] What to call the monadic return type?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-28 14:14:34

Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

> Without catch_error(), you need yet .then() as you want to be able to 
> recover from errors in the same way.

I wasn't suggesting removing .then, just adding .next. It's useful when I 
need to perform the same action regardless of whether I got a value or an 
exception.