Re: [boost] Boost.Test v3 is here

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test v3 is here
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-29 18:04:26

On May 29, 2015 1:15:38 PM EDT, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Marcel Raad <raad <at> teamviewer.com> writes:
> 
> > If I define BOOST_TEST_NO_OLD_TOOLS, I get 
> > a lot of compilation errors because of 
> > missing operator<< for the classes used 
> > with BOOST_TEST(a == b). Is that expected?
> 
> If a and b do not have operator << overloaded then yes.
> 
> You can use BOOST_TEST((a==b)) or can use 
> BOOST_TEST_DONT_PRINT_LOG_VALUE(type)

That's a ridiculously long macro name for a not uncommon use case.

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)