Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test v3 is here
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-29 13:15:38
Marcel Raad <raad <at> teamviewer.com> writes:
> Thanks a lot! I switched all my local
> tests to the develop version the last
> couple of days and encountered no problems
> in the default configuration. The new
> documentation is great too.
> If I define BOOST_TEST_NO_OLD_TOOLS, I get
> a lot of compilation errors because of
> missing operator<< for the classes used
> with BOOST_TEST(a == b). Is that expected?
If a and b do not have operator << overloaded then yes.
You can use BOOST_TEST((a==b)) or can use
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk