Re: [boost] Boost.Test v3 is here

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test v3 is here
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-29 13:15:38

Marcel Raad <raad <at> teamviewer.com> writes:

> Thanks a lot! I switched all my local 
> tests to the develop version the last 
> couple of days and encountered no problems 
> in the default configuration. The new 
> documentation is great too.
> 
> If I define BOOST_TEST_NO_OLD_TOOLS, I get 
> a lot of compilation errors because of 
> missing operator<< for the classes used 
> with BOOST_TEST(a == b). Is that expected?

If a and b do not have operator << overloaded then yes.

You can use BOOST_TEST((a==b)) or can use 
BOOST_TEST_DONT_PRINT_LOG_VALUE(type)

Gennadiy