Re: [boost] Boost.Container and tests: why is Boost.Test bypassed

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Container and tests: why is Boost.Test bypassed
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-02 23:12:25

Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge <at> nedprod.com> writes:

> Has any work been done on build time for Boost.Test v3?

I would not expect faster build time. That said on my two years old 
windows laptop build step takes maybe half a second on a simple test 
module (can't say for sure - it is actually too fast to notice). I would 
be interested to see some statistics about other people experience.

That said, no one forces you to sue included version. It is your decision 
which variant to use. You need to about a minute to produce a library and 
many Linux systems might have it around already.

Gennadiy