Subject: Re: [boost] Formalising the review process into a well specified workflow
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-03 11:06:03
Niall Douglas wrote:
> 5. Ideally in the future a review manager would have their own form
> with boxes to tick, and part of their form would be to check the form
> the library author filled in i.e. the forms themselves feed into one
> another as part of the programmed workflow.
No no no no no no no.
What we want is (a) common sense to be applied, and (b) domain
experts to actually do reviews, and (c) in the absence of too
many of those, non-experts to at least try the library and
express their opinions or drive the discussion by asking questions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk