Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost documentation with ability for users to post comments
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-05 16:51:52


On 6/5/15 12:04 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On Friday 05 June 2015 11:42:46 Robert Ramey wrote:
>> On 6/5/15 10:32 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Krzysztof Jusiak <krzysztof_at_[hidden]>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I have recently added such functionality to Boost.DI documentation using
>>>> https://disqus.com service.
>>
>> This looks extremely interesting to me. Very slick and very worthy of
>> consideration. Bears more investigation.
>>
> Personally, I'm not sure there's much value from this. Except, perhaps, as an
> easy way to report typos, errors and such, but then the comments themselves
> don't suit this activity very well. I'm looking at MSDN, for instance, and not
> seeing much value in the comments there -

I strongly disagree with this. I find documentation some boost
libraries truely awful. Totally incomprehensible. I was inspired to
propose this idea while having to do some work with PHP. PHP isn't the
best language - but it's plenty good for the task which has been
assigned to it. The documentation is quite good - much, much better
than documentation for most boost libraries. And it has the feature of
that users can clarify/expand/update information on any page. This
turns out to be indispensable as the documentation tends to overlook
many small corner cases or combinations. So I found it very, very
helpful and I think boost libraries would also benefit from this
facility. And let's not forget boost tools like bjam!

> looks more like a mini version of StackOverflow.

LOL - Is that a criticism? I think StackOverflow is great and I use it
all the time?

Robert Ramey


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk