Subject: Re: [boost] Preliminary submission of Boost Synapse
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-16 03:56:44
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Vladimir Prus <vladimir.prus_at_[hidden]>
> On 6/16/2015 3:52 AM, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>> I've made changes to Boost Synapse (a signal programming library) in part
>> based on feedback I received on the Boost mailing list, and I've uploaded
>> the updated source code and documentation to github:
> I've glanced through the tutorial and examples. The way you make signals
> 'external' to
> the class is quite smart.
> However, I have two questions:
> - There does not appear a way, given QObject*, to determine which signals
> are attached to it. Such reflection is one of the primary reasons MOC
> still exists, so your library will not eliminate the need for MOC?
I'm not an expert on Qt and there might be more reasons to need MOCing, but
I know for a fact that it is needed in order to add new signals to an
existing type. If you want to have a QDialog that emits your own custom
signals you must derive from QDialog, add the signals and MOC. Using
Synapse this can be avoided.
> - Looking at the first example, I can't help wondering why I would want
> to use the library - given that I can use QObject::connect, either
> or with function object, why would I use an extra library?
It really depends - if you're willing to couple any amount of your own code
with Qt, then you (obviously?) don't need Synapse. To me it is useful for
similar reasons that boost::function is useful: it lets me pull things
apart and decouple them. In the few Qt programs I've written, I'm using
Synapse as glue between the user interface code and the rest of the
program, while the UI code itself (being already coupled with Qt) mostly
doesn't use Synapse internally (except to add custom signals since I don't
Anyway, Synapse wasn't motivated by Qt, but by having to hook up callbacks
from other APIs that weren't quite as good as Qt, only it turned out it's
more practical than that. For example, one problem that has been quite
annoying for me in the past is how to connect a boost::function to a
Windows message. Synapse makes this a no-brainer.
I guess this is really what defines the library: it lets you connect a
boost::function to, dare I say, anything? :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk