|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [Hana] Formal review for Hana
From: Louis Dionne (ldionne.2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-17 09:47:37
Paul Fultz II <pfultz2 <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > > If you find the chaining much cleaner, then perhaps you could make it a
> > > pipable function instead:
> > >
> > > int_<10> | times([]{ std::cout << "foo" << std::endl; });
> > >
> > > This way it could still apply to any IntegralConstant.
> > « []
> >
> > That's an interesting idea. However, Hana does not have a concept of
> > pipable function, so that would need to be added somehow.
>
> Well, if you use Fit in the future, then Fit already provides the mechanism
> for that.
>
> > Sure, but a proper library-based Optional allows one to represent failures
> > caused by more than invalid expressions, which I think is more generally
> > useful. For example, you can define a safe division that ret¹Ì¹½Ñ¡¥¹(øøÝ¡¸å½Ô¥Ù¥äéɼ¸UÍ¥¹M%9½ÈÑ¡¥Ì͵̱¥ÕÍ¥¹¡
µµÈ(øøѼ(øøÍÉÜͽµÑ¡¥¹¸±Í¼°=ÁÑ¥½¹
°
±±½Ý̵½ÉͽÁ¡¥ÍÑ¥
ѽÁÉ
Ñ¥½¹Ì±¥(øø(øøÑÉ
¹Í½É´¡½Áа¤´ø
ÁÁ±¥ÌѼѡ½ÁÑ¥½¹
°Ù
±Õ¥¥Ð¥ÌÑ¡É°(øø
¹(øøÉÑÕɸ©ÕÍСѡÉÍձФ½È¹½Ñ¡¥¹¸(øø¥±ÑÈ¡½ÁаÁɤ´øÀÑ¡½ÁÑ¥½¹
°Ù
±Õ¥¥Ð¥ÌÑ¡É
¹¥Ð(øøÍ
ѥͥÌÑ¡ÁÉ¥
Ñ(øø(øø
¹µ
¹äµ½É¸
½µÁ½Í¥¹½ÁÑ¥½¹
°Ù
±Õ̱¥Ñ¡¥ÌÕÍ¥¹M%9µ¥¡Ð(øø¡
ÉÈ°%,¸(ø(ø$½¸ÐÍÝ¡ä¥Ðݽձ¡
ɸA±Õ̰ѡɥ̽µÁ¥±µÑ¥µÁɽɵ
¹(ø¹¥Ð°Í¥¹Ñ¡½µÁ¥±ÈÝ¥±°ÍѽÀ
ÐÑ¡¥ÉÍÐÍÕÍÑ¥ÑÕÑ¥½¸
¥±Õɸ()$½¸Ð¹½Ü°$©ÕÍнձ¸ÐÑ¡¥¹¬½Ý
äѼ
Í¥±ä×ÆVÖVçB6öÖWFæp¦Æ¶RFR6ö×ÆR×FÖR6Æ7VÆF÷"B³ÒW6ær&r4däRâFæ²B2V6W §Fòw&4däR&VæBâö&¦V7BæBFòW6R7GVÂgVæ7Föç2FòÖæVÆFRF0¦ö&¦V7B&FW"Fâ÷W&FærBFR4däRÖÆWfVÂF&V7FÇÂWfVâF÷VvF0§7W&VÇvfW26ö×ÆR×FÖR&VæVfBâvÒæ÷B6ærBw2×÷76&ÆRÂvÒ§W7@§6ærBæVVG2Æ÷BÖ÷&R7&VFfGFâW6ærâ÷FöæÂö&¦V7BÀ¦W7V6ÆÇ6æ6R2²²&öw&ÖÖW'2vÆÂ&RfÖÆ"vFFR'VçFÖR6öæ6W@§vVâ7FC£¦÷FöæÂvWG2âà £à£ââà£âââvW6öÖRâfR÷RF÷VvB&÷WBW6ærFffW&VçBFö7VÖVçFFöâFööÀ£âââç7FVBÂƶRÖ¶Fö72÷"7çð£ââ*²µÐ£âà£ââW2ÂvÒ7W'&VçFÇ6öç6FW&ær7vF6ærvg&öÒF÷vVââF÷VvFöâw@£ââ¶æ÷rvBvB7vF6FòâfRÆÖ÷7BöæÛH\]Z\[Y[È]BØÝ[Y[][ÛHÜ][[HÛÝ\ÙHÛÙKÙ[H\ÙHZÙØÜÈÜ][HÜ]H^HØÝ[Y[][Û[HÛÝ\ÙHÛÙK]H]HHØÜ\]Û\È[H\\\ËZÙØÜÈÛÝ[H^[YÈÈ\È]]ÛX]XØ[KHÛÚÙY][Ý\Ù]\[H[]]Z]HXÙKÝÙ]\IÛHÛÜYYXÝ]HÛÝ\HÙX]\\ÈHYYÜ^[\K]\ÈÜÜÚXHÈ[ÛYHÛÙBÛ\]ÈZÙ[ÛHXÝX[[\ÈÜH^[\\ÏÈ[ÛË\È\HÛÛYBÜÜÜË\Y\[Ú[ÈÛÚ[ÈÛ[HÛÝ\ÙHÛÙKÛÈ[ÜÈ\HÙ[\]Y]]ÛX]XØ[OÈÝ\[H[ÈHYXHÙ\Ú[ÈH[\]HÈÙ[\]BHÝ]XÈÚ]HZÙH^HÈ\ÈH\ÝYXH[] ÜÈH]\K]IÛB\ÝÛÜYYHÚXÝZYÚÝÝYH[ÝYÚX]\\È]H[nt?
> > > Well, there is several ways it could be formailised, but either `head`
> > and
> > > `tail` do not exist for an empty sequence,
> >
> > I don't want to use SFINAE to determine this. What if we want to support
> > runtime Iterables like std::vector, that only know they're empty at
> > runtime?
>
> Then `is_empty` would be required for runtime sequences.
>
>
> > > or if `tail` always returns an empty sequence even when empty, you just
> > > detect that `seq == tail(seq)`.
> >
> > Well, `tail` will fail when called on an empty sequence. But let's assume
> > this was not the case. You would then be required to implement `==` for
> > your Iterable, which is much more complicated than implementing
> > `is_empty`.
>
> Well you could simply rely on `sèé¥Í}Í
µ¸Ð±
Íаѡ¥Ì½¹±ä
ÁÁ±¥ÌѼ(ø½µÁ¥±µÑ¥µÍÅչ̰¹½ÐÉչѥµÍÅչ̸()µ
}ÑÕÁ±¡¥¹Ñ|ðÄø¤½µÁ
ÉÌÅÕ
°Ñ¼µ
}ÑÕÁ±¡±½¹|ðÄø¤°Ù¸Ñ¡½Õ Ñ¡ä)¡
٥ɹÐÑåÁ̸M¼ÍÑèé¥Í}Í
µÝ½Õ±¸Ð¹É
°¹½Õ ¸=ÙÉ
±°°$)Ñ¡¥¹¬
Í¥¹½È¥Í}µÁÑäѼÍÁ¥¥áÁ±¥¥Ñ±ä¥ÌÙÉä¹
ÑÕÉ
°°
¹¥Ð)Í¡½Õ±
±Í¼ÙÉä
ÍäѼ¼¸M
äå½ÔÉÝɥѥ¹±
éäÍÑÉ
´½Èͽµ½Ñ¡È)ÍÅÕ¹¹É
Ñ¥¹ÍÑÕ½¸Ñ¡±ä¸ÐÑ¡µ½ÍÐ
Í¥±Ù°°Ñ¡É
ÉÑ¡É)Ñ¡¥¹Ìå½Ô¹Ñ¼Áɽ٥Ѽå½ÕÈÕÍÉÌè(´Ý
äѼÐÑ¡¥ÉÍбµ¹Ð½Ñ¡ÍÑÉ
´°¤¹¸Ñ¡ÕÉɹбµ¹Ð¸(Q¡
ÐÌÑ¡¡
չѥ½¸¸(´Ý
äѼ
Ù
¹Ñ¡ÍÑÉ
´ä½¹Á½Í¥Ñ¥½¸°¤¹¸Ñ¼ÐѼѡ¹áбµ¹Ð¸(Q¡
ÐÌÑ¡Ñ
¥±Õ¹Ñ¥½¸¸(´Ý
äѼ¹½ÜÝ¡¸Ñ¡ÍÑÒ2FöæR&öGV6ærfÇVW2à¢FBw2FR5öV×GgVæ7Föâà £âââââ6öæ6FVæFær&ævW2FöW2æ÷BÖ¶R6Vç6Râæ&ævR2£ââ6öçFwV÷W0£ââââ6WVVæ6Röb6ö×ÆR×FÖRçFVvW'2âvBVç2vVâ÷P£ââ6öæ6FVæFP£ââââÖ¶U÷&ævRö2Â5ö2vFÖ¶U÷&ævReö2Âö2òBw2æ÷@£ââââ6öçFwV÷W2çÖ÷&RÂ6òBw2æ÷B&ævRçÖ÷&Rà£ââà£âââWfVâF÷Vv6öæ6BF¶W2&ævRÂv6âwBB§W7B&WGW&âGWÆP£ââç7FVCð£ââ*²µÐ£âà£ââ6öæ6Fw26væGW&R0£âà£ââÒ
BÒ
BÓâÒ
B£âà£ââvW&RÒ2çÖöæEÇW2âÖFVÖF6ÆÇÂF226ÖÆ"FòFR÷W&Föà£ââöbÖöæöBÂW6WBB2VæfW'6ÆÇVçFfVBöâBâBv÷VÆB&VÆÇ£ââ'&V°£ââFR6öæ6WGVÂçFVw&G£à£â÷rFöW2B'&V²FR6öæ6WG[YÜ]OÈ\ÛÝH\HH[ÛY\È\ÂÙ[ÂHH\ÈÈHHÚ[ÛH[Ë]Ø[ÝHH[ÙH[H\H]HØ[YB[YK[Ý\ÛÜË[ÙJ
H[ÙJ
HO\J
BÙ\ÈÝX]ÚHÚYÛ]\BJ
HJ
HOJ
B]]Ù\ÈX]ÚJ
HJ
HOJ
BÝÈ\È]\ÜÈ\ØXOÈ]ÙY[\ÈZÙH]ÛÝ[H[ÜH\ØXKÚ[ÙHBX\HØ[ÝÈÝ\ÜÛÛ\[\ÈÚ]ÈÜZÞH\XXH[\]\Ë0ªÈ×BHÚ[\HYX[][ÏOßX\È\ÜÈ]H[[ÏO]\ÈÛÙ\HXÝ] H[[ÜÝ[\Ü[H]YX]ÈH[ÜÛÜH]ÙIÜBX[\[][ÈØXÝËÝ\\ËHÛÝÙYHÝÈ]XZÜÈH[ÜÛÜK\O
X\ÈØ[Ý\ÛH[ØXÝ[]ÛÚÜÈ][[ÜHÛÈZÙH[ject than a variable template.
> It is only two more characters, and is simpler and cleaner than using the
> variable templates.
I really don't think it's cleaner, but that's subjective.
> > At any rate, compilers other than Clang and GCC are probably missing far
> > too
> > many features (other than variable templates) for them to compile Hana. I
> > don't think variable templates would change much to that.
>
> Well, it might be possible to support compilers such as gcc 4.9 or clang
> 3.4. Obviously, visual studio will be out of the question for at least
> another half of decade.
I have no interest in supporting non-C++14 compilers. Hana is a cutting
edge library, and much of its purpose would be lost if it were to include
workarounds for older compiÉ̸]É¥¸ÈÀÄÔ°
¹½µÁ¥±ÉÌÝ¥±°
Ñ ÕÀ¸()±Í¼°!
¹ÁɽÁ½Í̹ÜÁ
É
¥´¸]½¸Ð¹½Ü¡½ÜѼձ±äÑ
Ù
¹Ñ
)½¥Ð°
¹Ý½¸Ð¹½ÜÝ¡
Ð
É¥Ṉ̃¥µ¥ÑÌåи±½Ð½Ñ¥µÝ¥±°Á
ÍÌ)½É¥ÐÉÁ±
ÌÕÍ¥½¸
¹5A0°
¹¥Ðµ¥¡Ð
±Í¼¹ÙÈ¡
ÁÁ¸¸$ÍÑ¥±°)Ñ¡¥¹¬!
¹Ý¥±°ÍÑ
ä
¸áÁÉ¥µ¹Ñ
°±¥É
ÉäÕ͵½Íѱää¡
ɽɬ¬)ÁɽÉ
µµÉ̽È
б
ÍнÕÁ±½µ½¹Ñ¡Ì¸Q¡ÍÁɽÉ
µµÉÌ
ɹ½ÐÍÑÕ¬)½¸
±
¹Ì¸Ð
¹åÝ
ä°Í¼ÍÕÁÁ½ÉÑ¥¹¥Ð
̱¥ÑѱÙ
±Õ%5!<¸()¥¹
±±ä°Ñ¡É
ÉÕÍ
̽¹É¥±
µ
Ì
¹¹É
±¥é½¹ÍÑáÁÈÑ¡
Ð)ݽձµ½Íб¥±äµ
½±È½µÁ¥±ÉÌÍÉ
´¸$½¸ÐÑ¡¥¹¬Ù
É¥
±)ѵÁ±
ÑÌ
ÉÑ¡¥ÍÐ
¹Ñ¤µÁ½ÉÑ
¥±¥Ñä
ѽȥ¸!
¹¸(((øøøUÍ¥¹ÁÁ±Ì±
¹Ø°Ý¡¥ ½ÉÉÍÁ½¹ÌѼ±
¹Ì¸Ô½½RG'Væ²à£ââ*²µÐ£âà£ââ6ò÷Rw&RvF6öFRÂ2ãbÂ&vCòF22æ÷B7W÷'FVBÂVæf÷'GVæFVÇà£ââFöâwB¶æ÷rvVâÆR'&æ6VBöb6Æær2ãRÂ÷"vBFWFBFòBÀ£ââ'WBBÇWÆöFW2öâ×6ö×WFW"Föòà£à£âvVÆÂG26öFRbã"à ¥6÷''ÂÖVçBFò6²b÷RvW&RW6ær6öFRÂbã2æ÷B2ãbÂv6÷R&Rà¤2Fö7VÖVçFVBâFR$TDÔR³%ÒÂB2Væf÷'GVæFVÇVç7W÷'FVBà¤÷vWfW"Â÷Rw&Röâõ2æB÷RfRöÖV'&Wrõö¶æ÷uõò÷RFò¢Òà ¢'&WrFöÖV'&Wr÷fW'6öç0¢'&Wrç7FÆÂÆÇfÓ3` ¤Bw2fW'V6²Fòç7FÆÂ&V6W6RBw2&÷GFÆRÂ6ò÷RFöâwBfRFð¦6ö×ÆRB÷W'6VÆbâæBFVâævÆÂ&RgVÆÇv÷&¶ærà ¥&Vv&G2À¤Æ÷V0 ¥³Ó¢GG3¢òövöòævÂ÷Ófd¶ ¥³%Ó¢GG3¢òövFV"æ6öÒöÆFöææRöæ7&W&WV6FW2ÖæBÖç7FÆÆFö
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk