Re: [boost] [Hana] Formal review

Subject: Re: [boost] [Hana] Formal review
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-18 11:17:02

On 6/17/15 11:57 PM, Joel de Guzman wrote:
> A very minimal subset is all that I need, no more. C++14 is rich enough
> to do TMP easily unlike before when MPL and Fusion were invented. Perhaps
> you don't even need a TMP library anymore! As a matter of fact, Thomas
> Heller and I are working on a phoenix-lite experiment with zero TMP
> library dependencies (only uses std, nothing more). Compile times?
> Blink of an eye!

I've been long time user of MPL.  Now I'm getting to know C++11. From 
reading this list - in particular Peter Dimov's "Simple C++ TMP" I'm 
coming to believe that this is the simplest low overhead approach for 
me.  Peter's document is another masterpiece.  I would like to see it 
reformated in a way which is easier to use as a reference - sort of a 
C++11+ TMP "cheatsheet". I'm actually considering do this as a personal 
exercise in order to really understand and internalize it.

Robert Ramey