Re: [boost] needs coroutine2 a review?

Subject: Re: [boost] needs coroutine2 a review?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-21 05:05:55

Le 02/06/15 11:00, Oliver Kowalke a écrit :
> coroutine2 is a C++14-only library, providing cleaner code
> (maintainability) + it fixes some issues (moveable-only parameters).
> boost.coroutine will be deprecated.
Up to when boost.coroutine will be deprecated? By what users of 
boost.coroutine in c++98 would replace the deprecated library?
Is there any library in Boost that depends on Boost.Coroutine?
I've the impression that you will need to maintain it still for some years.

> The conclusion of the last discussion (
> http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/transforming-ex-boost-lib-into-C-11-only-lib-td4671503.html)
This thread doesn't contains the coroutine word on the title :(
> was to establish coroutine2 as a separate lib beside of boost.coroutine -
> similar to boost.signals(2).
>
> I'm wondering if coroutine2 needs a review, even if the interface remains
> the same compared to boost.coroutine.
>
>

In your case, you are adding more but restricted to C++14 compilers. I 
don't think that review is needed in this is the case.

I believe that it is up to you to decide if you needs a review. Spirit 
uses to request a review for each new version, but the interface are not 
preserved.

Best,
Vicente